So, if the word “Government”, defined as limited to the political realm, is understood as no longer adequate to describe the power-base of societal leadership, then what do we call this socioeconomical-leadership? It does require a new name so as to more accurately identify and understand this overruling entity. I offer “Social Game Maker”. There can be many names – perhaps you could come up with one too. I think it is important that we be clear in our language. “Government” is not calling the shots in the Big Game, they are only an instrument, a tool, of the “Social Game Maker(s)”.
So, I offer some new definitions to our expanded awareness vocabulary – our extended and more fine-tuned filter system.
Social Game Maker: any individual or institution that stands up in leadership, and in doing so, has a more macro effect on the health and resilience of a community.
Contributive Social Game Maker: any individual or institution where the operational/business model is based on making a contribution to the tribe (humanity), and in service to – toward the betterment and increased thriving of a community.
Exploitative Social Game Maker: any individual or institution that employs exploitation, manipulation, and deceit as a foundation of their operational/business model. This entity depends primarily on money, especially the use of usury, (money lending with interest and debt) as a primary instrument to fuel their business model and their expanded power and control.
Now let’s look at where we assign our power in this “Big Game” today.
We need to look at our transactions and where we make a agreements and contracts.
We must be more aware of our “transactions” – assess more of them in the filter of balance – discern who we are transacting/contracting with. Do we know who we are transacting with personally? Who or what is at the other end of the transaction? There seems to be a steady and increasing transaction flow in our lives, from signing a mortgage contract, to signing a credit card slip in the grocery store. But our transactions also include a spectrum of thought, from attachment to disempowering beliefs of unworthiness, to every thought in negative emotional attachment to FEAR. Whether you are signing a physical paper contract, clicking on an “agree with” box on the internet, or emotionally acquiescing to an external demand or instruction that is in some way energetically connected with your fear or doubt about your own worthiness – some accepted hierarchy of power, these are all transactions and contracts that you must filter more tightly, and persistently stretch your conscious awareness into. As you do, you will weed out the sleeping pills and open up the explosion of marketplaces for “Contributive Game Makers” to thrive.
But once again, and this is a constant in the universe (although we seem to have not proven it yet on this planet) – once again we see that massive change only happens, and can be sustained, if first we all stand up in our power and sovereignty. In our “Duty”. Our duty as powerfully instructed by the USA forefathers in the Declaration of Independence.
In 1776, perhaps “government” had a shot (and I’m not completely sure about this) to really serve the people. Today the Government is a pure instrument of increasing wealth concentration, and manipulative power of Exploitative Game Makers.
So, what is our duty in the context of the big game afoot in these early years of the 12st Century?
From the Declaration…Perhaps we can replace the word “Governments & Government” with “Social Game Makers“… Now, what is our DUTY?!
“…That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security…”